History vs. Story

It’s spelled “story” – without the “hi” at the beginning. Still, many people approach telling stories as recounting historical events. In a chronological order. Even if their audience couldn’t care less about how it all began.

It’s much more interesting to ask yourself what gets your audience most excited. What’s most surprising to them? Or most interesting. And then work from there. Once you tell them, what do they want to know next? And next. And so on.

For example, sometimes it’s more interesting to work backwards by asking “How was that possible?” or “What led to this?” Just like some of the most exciting detective stories start with knowing who the murderer was but leave the audience dying to learn why she did it.

The guiding star is our audience’s curiosity. What are they dying to know? More often than not this is different from the chronological order of events.

Don’t make your story a history lesson, make it an interesting story!

Check out my new book
The PATH to Strategic Impact

Get my free guide The Best Talk of Your Life.
Finally give talks that actually change things.

You’ll get the guide and my free weekly briefing “This Moment Counts.
Unsubscribe anytime. I value your privacy.

Read More

How would you improve it?

“How would you improve it?” 
vs.
“What would you improve?” The latter is satisfied by “I don’t like this aspect and that one”. It invites destructive

Read »

I have a problem

When someone shares a problem with you, what they need might be a solution to their problem, sure. But then again, perhaps they need something

Read »