Posts in Tag: wow

Isn’t this obvious?

This might disappoint some of you: The strongest strategy in 2026 will sound boring in the boardroom and obvious in the field.

Yup. You’ve read that right. Boring and obvious. Not grand or clever.

Why? Because the only measure of a strategy is whether it shapes the choices that actually have to be made in the field. Not how clever it sounds and how impressive the slide deck looks. Simply whether it leads to action.

Now, guess when people are most likely to act? Exactly! When the action is obvious.

When people in the field say “yes, of course” after hearing your strategy, you’ve nailed it. If you’ve ever seen it in action, you know that an “of course effect” is so much stronger than any “wow effect”.

The only problem is that “of course” sounds boring. Which is why people avoid it.

Which, in turn, is why it might be your biggest advantage to embrace it.

Leaders who light the path don’t try to impress. They choose words that make the path impossible to miss.

Even if that sounds boring and obvious.

What’s your take? Does a strategy need to sound “exciting”?

Keep lighting the path,
Michael

Does your message need more bang?

Your message doesn’t need to be more powerful.
It needs to be more obvious.

If people don’t act, the instinct is usually to add more bang to the message and crank up the volume:
→ Make it fancy.
→ Make it spectacular.
→ Make it “Wow.”

The only problem is that fancy doesn’t mean clear.
And spectacular doesn’t mean actionable.

The thing is:
People don’t act on “Wow.”
They act on “Aha.”

They move forward when the message clicks so naturally that it feels like their own thought.

When they hear it and think, “Of course.”

Most of the great communicators I’ve worked with couldn’t care less about dazzling people.

They wanted their words so clear that action feels undeniable.

What if you stopped chasing the fanciness of “Wow”
and started aiming for the clarity of “Aha”?

Keep lighting the path!

More than fun

Wow is fun.
Aha is fundamental.

Wouldn’t you agree that one of them is more fun than the other?

What do you think?

Keep lighting the path!

Glitter and glam

A powerful message doesn’t need backup dancers or flashy props. It stands alone, clear and strong.

Here’s a simple test:
When you strip away the extras, what’s left?

If your message is strong, it will still resonate.
If it’s weak, it will now crumble.

That’s precisely why some believe that a little glitter will make up for a weak message.

But adding glitter won’t make your message strong,
it only distracts from the weaknesses.

Superficial wow elements will never make up for a missing aha.

On the other hand, once your message is strong enough to stand on its own, then adding the wow can amplify its impact manifold.

In other words, when you have a strong message, skillfully composed, the extras aren’t there to distract from the message, they are there to serve the message.

PS: Reach out if you need help finding that strong message.

Get This Moment Counts in your inbox.
How exceptional leaders communicate when the message has to land

    I value your privacy. No spam. Just “Great stuff, brilliantly articulated” (to use the words of longtime reader David).