Why our brains make it sometimes so hard to make others see what we see …
Read more thoughts on the art of communicating week-daily at https://michaelgerharz.com/blog
Transcript
Speaking is a sequential process.
Speaker:We can only speak one word after another.
Speaker:However, thoughts aren’t sequential.
Speaker:When I think something, let's say the word “orange”, a network of associations
Speaker:immediately pops up in my brain.
Speaker:In yours, too.
Speaker:But most likely yours is different than mine.
Speaker:Thoughts form a network.
Speaker:One thought leads to other thoughts, which lead to yet more
Speaker:thoughts, loosely connected and jumping from one to the other.
Speaker:One of the major challenges for speakers is that our audiences’ networks of
Speaker:associations are different from ours.
What's worse:we can't just tell somebody our network of
What's worse:associations, because there's no easy way of serializing that network.
What's worse:Speaking is sequential.
What's worse:It requires a series of thoughts.
What's worse:If we want to tell somebody something, it can only be done one word after another.
What's worse:My knowledge network has to be transformed into a linear stream of information.
What's worse:The problem is that every thought, every word even, in this stream
What's worse:of information, sparks a network of associations for our audience.
What's worse:And again for the next thought.
What's worse:Our hope is that it will fit into our audience's knowledge net in a meaningful
What's worse:way, ideally ending up with the same network than we have in our heads.
What's worse:But that's far from guaranteed.
What's worse:And there's no easy way to find out.
What's worse:But a good start is to acknowledge this dilemma and take into
What's worse:account that our audiences might have a completely different set
What's worse:of associations than we have.